|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
Fecha : |
26/07/2021 |
Actualizado : |
26/07/2021 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Autor : |
TSENG, C-M.; ROEL, A.; MACEDO, I.; MARELLA, M.; TERRA, J.A.; PITTELKOW, C. M. |
Afiliación : |
MENG-CHUN TSENG, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA; ALVARO ROEL DELLAZOPPA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; IGNACIO MACEDO YAPOR, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MUZIO MARELLA, Sociedad Anónima Molinos Arroceros Nacionales (SAMAN), Uruguay; JOSÉ ALFREDO TERRA FERNÁNDEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CAMERON M. PITTELKOW, Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA. |
Título : |
Synergies and tradeoffs among yield, resource use efficiency, and environmental footprint indicators in rice systems. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 2021, volume 3, 100070. OPEN ACCESS. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2021.100070 |
DOI : |
10.1016/j.crsust.2021.100070 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 30 April 2021 / / Revised 12 July 2021 // Accepted 13 July 2021 // Available online 24 July 2021. |
Contenido : |
A major question facing global rice systems is the extent to which yield and resource use efficiency indicators can be simultaneously optimized to sustainably meet future food demand. However, research approaches for evaluating synergies and tradeoffs among multiple indicators have been limited to date. Using the case study of rice production in Uruguay, we quantified five cropping system performance indicators at the farm-level from 2012 to 2017, covering approximately 40% of national rice area. Results suggest that maximizing performance in one
indicator is associated with tradeoffs for other indicators, with no farm simultaneously ranking as a topperformer (defined as top 10% of farms) across all indicators. The gaps between the average and topperforming farms were largest for agrochemical contamination risk (33%) and smallest for yield (11%). Comparing the groups of top-performing farms within each indicator revealed opportunities for improving system-level performance via synergistic effects between yield and resource use efficiencies, but not between carbon footprint, agrochemical contamination risk, and other indicators. Importantly, synergistic effects were more pronounced for farms at lower compared to higher productivity levels, suggesting less room for ustainability improvements at higher yield levels, unless yields can be further increased without elevated inputs. Important factors to improve the aggregated sustainability index included N fertilizer rate and seeding date. With potential application to rice production systems worldwide, this study highlights an integrated research approach for quantifying synergies and tradeoffs among multiple indicators to understand opportunities for increasing crop yields without negatively impacting resource use efficiency and environmental footprint. MenosA major question facing global rice systems is the extent to which yield and resource use efficiency indicators can be simultaneously optimized to sustainably meet future food demand. However, research approaches for evaluating synergies and tradeoffs among multiple indicators have been limited to date. Using the case study of rice production in Uruguay, we quantified five cropping system performance indicators at the farm-level from 2012 to 2017, covering approximately 40% of national rice area. Results suggest that maximizing performance in one
indicator is associated with tradeoffs for other indicators, with no farm simultaneously ranking as a topperformer (defined as top 10% of farms) across all indicators. The gaps between the average and topperforming farms were largest for agrochemical contamination risk (33%) and smallest for yield (11%). Comparing the groups of top-performing farms within each indicator revealed opportunities for improving system-level performance via synergistic effects between yield and resource use efficiencies, but not between carbon footprint, agrochemical contamination risk, and other indicators. Importantly, synergistic effects were more pronounced for farms at lower compared to higher productivity levels, suggesting less room for ustainability improvements at higher yield levels, unless yields can be further increased without elevated inputs. Important factors to improve the aggregated sustainability index included N fertilizer rate and seed... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
CARBON FOOTPRINT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; NITROGEN USE EFFICIENCE; RICE; SUSTAINABILITY; TRADEOFFS. |
Asunto categoría : |
P01 Conservación de la naturaleza y recursos de La tierra |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/15908/1/Current-Research-Environmental-Sustainability-2021-3-100070.pdf
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666049021000463
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02847naa a2200277 a 4500 001 1062325 005 2021-07-26 008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1016/j.crsust.2021.100070$2DOI 100 1 $aTSENG, C-M. 245 $aSynergies and tradeoffs among yield, resource use efficiency, and environmental footprint indicators in rice systems.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2021 500 $aArticle history: Received 30 April 2021 / / Revised 12 July 2021 // Accepted 13 July 2021 // Available online 24 July 2021. 520 $aA major question facing global rice systems is the extent to which yield and resource use efficiency indicators can be simultaneously optimized to sustainably meet future food demand. However, research approaches for evaluating synergies and tradeoffs among multiple indicators have been limited to date. Using the case study of rice production in Uruguay, we quantified five cropping system performance indicators at the farm-level from 2012 to 2017, covering approximately 40% of national rice area. Results suggest that maximizing performance in one indicator is associated with tradeoffs for other indicators, with no farm simultaneously ranking as a topperformer (defined as top 10% of farms) across all indicators. The gaps between the average and topperforming farms were largest for agrochemical contamination risk (33%) and smallest for yield (11%). Comparing the groups of top-performing farms within each indicator revealed opportunities for improving system-level performance via synergistic effects between yield and resource use efficiencies, but not between carbon footprint, agrochemical contamination risk, and other indicators. Importantly, synergistic effects were more pronounced for farms at lower compared to higher productivity levels, suggesting less room for ustainability improvements at higher yield levels, unless yields can be further increased without elevated inputs. Important factors to improve the aggregated sustainability index included N fertilizer rate and seeding date. With potential application to rice production systems worldwide, this study highlights an integrated research approach for quantifying synergies and tradeoffs among multiple indicators to understand opportunities for increasing crop yields without negatively impacting resource use efficiency and environmental footprint. 653 $aCARBON FOOTPRINT 653 $aENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 653 $aNITROGEN USE EFFICIENCE 653 $aRICE 653 $aSUSTAINABILITY 653 $aTRADEOFFS 700 1 $aROEL, A. 700 1 $aMACEDO, I. 700 1 $aMARELLA, M. 700 1 $aTERRA, J.A. 700 1 $aPITTELKOW, C. M. 773 $tCurrent Research in Environmental Sustainability, 2021, volume 3, 100070. OPEN ACCESS. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2021.100070
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó. |
Fecha actual : |
15/07/2015 |
Actualizado : |
15/10/2019 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Revista INIA |
Autor : |
INIA (INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIÓN AGROPECUARIA) |
Título : |
Revista INIA Uruguay. (No.13, Diciembre 2007). |
Fecha de publicación : |
2007 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Montevideo (Uruguay): INIA, 2007. |
Páginas : |
52 p |
Serie : |
(Revista INIA; 13) |
ISSN : |
1510-9011 |
Idioma : |
Español |
Thesagro : |
ARROZ; BIOTECNOLOGIA; BOVINOS DE CARNE; CAMBIO CLIMÁTICO; CIENCIA; CITRUS; CLIMA; CLIMATOLOGIA; COMUNICACIÓN; CONTROL DE ENFERMEDADES; CULTIVOS DE GRANO; CULTIVOS DE SECANO; ENTOMOLOGIA; ESPECIES FORRAJERAS; EUCALYPTUS; EXPLOTACION AGRICOLA FAMILIAR; FITOPATOLOGÍA; FORESTALES; FORRAJES; FRUTALES; FRUTICULTURA; GANADO BOVINO; GRANOS; GRAS; HORTALIZAS; HORTICULTURA; INIA; INNOVACION; INVESTIGACIÓN; LECHERÍA; LEGUMINOSAS FORRAJERAS; MANEJO DEL CULTIVO; MEJORAMIENTO ANIMAL; METEOROLOGIA; MICROBIOLOGÍA; OVINOS; PASTURAS; PRODUCCIÓN ANIMAL; PRODUCCION DE LANA; PRODUCCION DE LECHE; PRODUCCION LECHERA; REVISTA INIA 2007; SEMILLAS; SOJA; SUELOS; SUINOS; SUSTENTABILIDAD AMBIENTAL; TECNOLOGÍA; TRANSFERENCIA DE TECNOLOGIA; VARIEDADES; VITICULTURA. |
Asunto categoría : |
A50 Investigación agraria |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/4822/1/revista-INIA-13.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 01908nam a2200745 a 4500 001 1053074 005 2019-10-15 008 2007 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a1510-9011 100 1 $aINIA (INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIÓN AGROPECUARIA) 245 $aRevista INIA Uruguay. (No.13, Diciembre 2007). 260 $aMontevideo (Uruguay): INIA$c2007 300 $a52 p 490 $a(Revista INIA; 13) 650 $aARROZ 650 $aBIOTECNOLOGIA 650 $aBOVINOS DE CARNE 650 $aCAMBIO CLIMÁTICO 650 $aCIENCIA 650 $aCITRUS 650 $aCLIMA 650 $aCLIMATOLOGIA 650 $aCOMUNICACIÓN 650 $aCONTROL DE ENFERMEDADES 650 $aCULTIVOS DE GRANO 650 $aCULTIVOS DE SECANO 650 $aENTOMOLOGIA 650 $aESPECIES FORRAJERAS 650 $aEUCALYPTUS 650 $aEXPLOTACION AGRICOLA FAMILIAR 650 $aFITOPATOLOGÍA 650 $aFORESTALES 650 $aFORRAJES 650 $aFRUTALES 650 $aFRUTICULTURA 650 $aGANADO BOVINO 650 $aGRANOS 650 $aGRAS 650 $aHORTALIZAS 650 $aHORTICULTURA 650 $aINIA 650 $aINNOVACION 650 $aINVESTIGACIÓN 650 $aLECHERÍA 650 $aLEGUMINOSAS FORRAJERAS 650 $aMANEJO DEL CULTIVO 650 $aMEJORAMIENTO ANIMAL 650 $aMETEOROLOGIA 650 $aMICROBIOLOGÍA 650 $aOVINOS 650 $aPASTURAS 650 $aPRODUCCIÓN ANIMAL 650 $aPRODUCCION DE LANA 650 $aPRODUCCION DE LECHE 650 $aPRODUCCION LECHERA 650 $aREVISTA INIA 2007 650 $aSEMILLAS 650 $aSOJA 650 $aSUELOS 650 $aSUINOS 650 $aSUSTENTABILIDAD AMBIENTAL 650 $aTECNOLOGÍA 650 $aTRANSFERENCIA DE TECNOLOGIA 650 $aVARIEDADES 650 $aVITICULTURA
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|